The Redcoats Are Coming?
The US military is planning to fight the Tea Party on US soil in 2016. What does it mean? And why the Tea Party and it's imaginary militias? What about La Raza, the Black Panthers and other groups that have already called for armed revolution?
Retired Colonel Kevin Benson PhD is a serious person and a principle planner on the invasion of Iraq. When a guy like Benson writes a policy paper of this nature, one needs to take this seriously. Irons in the Fire provides excellent background detail.
Benson may be a genius but the inner idiot stands out. Firstly, choosing the Tea Party as the rebellious entity example is ridiculous. After all, they are one of the only groups that actually stand for and support the Constitution opposed to tyranny's large and small that are gobbling up the Constitution on a daily basis. A really bad example Kevin.
Secondly, as Irons points out, does the military expect soldiers to obey orders to kill Americans? Which direction will military weapons be pointed once "full spectrum operations" begin? If big corporations like AECOM Technology think that they are the patriots in this fight, they may find that they are the Redcoats. Exactly who wants to be a Redcoat in American Society. Especially in a perpetual Depression in the US.
Lastly, this society is deeply divided at every level across the entire country. People have learned the Obama/ Alinsky "never let a crisis go to waste" paradigm. Does Benson actually believe that Darlington would be an isolated event that would support the Federal view at all levels? How would states respond? Who might muster out elsewhere? Once full spectrum operations begin, fourth generation warfare activities are a certainty.
This paper was a dumb idea that opened a dangerous Pandora's Box in Obama's kill list America. It advances the idea of conspiracy theories and feels like we're being boxed into a corner with no way out. There are 314 million Americans. Do a few million Federal authorities really think they stand a chance against a just and popular uprising? Are Assad's troops gonna shell Aleppo? How did that work for Gaddafi?
Retired Colonel Kevin Benson PhD is a serious person and a principle planner on the invasion of Iraq. When a guy like Benson writes a policy paper of this nature, one needs to take this seriously. Irons in the Fire provides excellent background detail.
Benson may be a genius but the inner idiot stands out. Firstly, choosing the Tea Party as the rebellious entity example is ridiculous. After all, they are one of the only groups that actually stand for and support the Constitution opposed to tyranny's large and small that are gobbling up the Constitution on a daily basis. A really bad example Kevin.
Secondly, as Irons points out, does the military expect soldiers to obey orders to kill Americans? Which direction will military weapons be pointed once "full spectrum operations" begin? If big corporations like AECOM Technology think that they are the patriots in this fight, they may find that they are the Redcoats. Exactly who wants to be a Redcoat in American Society. Especially in a perpetual Depression in the US.
Lastly, this society is deeply divided at every level across the entire country. People have learned the Obama/ Alinsky "never let a crisis go to waste" paradigm. Does Benson actually believe that Darlington would be an isolated event that would support the Federal view at all levels? How would states respond? Who might muster out elsewhere? Once full spectrum operations begin, fourth generation warfare activities are a certainty.
This paper was a dumb idea that opened a dangerous Pandora's Box in Obama's kill list America. It advances the idea of conspiracy theories and feels like we're being boxed into a corner with no way out. There are 314 million Americans. Do a few million Federal authorities really think they stand a chance against a just and popular uprising? Are Assad's troops gonna shell Aleppo? How did that work for Gaddafi?
posted by lugh lampfhota at 11:10 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home